Legal Opinion

Borissoff v. Taylor & Faust

California Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 2004No. S105600PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WERDEGAR, J.

This case raises the question whether the successor fiduciary of an estate in probate may assert a professional negligence claim against attorneys retained by a predecessor fiduciary to provide tax assistance for the benefit of the estate. We hold the successor fiduciary may do so.

I. BACKGROUND

Testator Veronica M. Smith died on June 16, 1989, leaving two wills, one executed in 1983 and the other in 1987. The 1987 will named plaintiff Robert A. Borissoff as executor. Decedent’s grandniece filed an action in probate court to contest the 1987 will. Pending resolution of the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Lucas v. HammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Goodman v. KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. People v. EubanksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Trask v. ButlerWashington Supreme Court · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Smith v. CimmetCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. Estate of Thomas E. Cabatit v. Stephen A. CandersSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
  3. Orange Catholic Found. v. Arvizu, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. Paul v. PattonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. Stine v. Dell'OssoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API