Paul v. Patton
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PREMO, J.
The decedent, Gilbert Paul, retained Attorney Richard Patton to draft an amendment to his revocable living trust. The decedent signed the “Trust Amendment,” which, as drafted by Patton, named the decedent’s wife, Helen, and his children, Stephen Paul, David Paul, Alan Paul, and Nancy Dybdahl as beneficiaries. Stephen and David Paul also are the successor trustees of the trust. Following the decedent’s death, they petitioned the probate court to modify the Trust Amendment, alleging it failed to conform to the decedent’s intentions by erroneously granting Helen an interest in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Lucas v. HammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Heyer v. FlaigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Laird v. BlackerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Nolte v. Cedars Sinai Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Monster Energy Co. v. Schechter, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Carbon Crest LLC v. Tencue Productions, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
- Estate of Stafford CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Gordon v. Ervin Cohen & Jessup LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.