Legal Opinion
Lipscomb v. Electronic Data Systems Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided November 28, 2006No. CIV.05 477 SLRPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SUE L. ROBINSON, Chief Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Hestal Lipscomb (“plaintiff’) filed a complaint against defendant Electronic Data Systems Corporation (“defendant”) on July 8, 2005, alleging interference of Lipscomb’s rights under the Family Medical and Leave Act (“FMLA”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 2601 et seq., and unlawful retaliation against Lipscomb for exercising her rights under the FMLA. (D.I. 1) The discovery period in this case is closed. (D.I. 8) Presently before the court is defendant’s motion for summary judgment. (D.I. 34) This court has jurisdiction over plaintiffs…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Alred v. Eli Lilly & Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 2011
- Chapman v. UPMC Health SystemDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
- Alred v. Eli Lilly and CompanyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2011
- Rumanek v. Independent School Management, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2014
- Barker v. Genesys PHO, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014