Legal Opinion
Alred v. Eli Lilly & Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided March 22, 2011No. C.A. No. 08-092-LPSPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
STARK, District Judge:
Presently before the Court is a Motion For Summary Judgment (D.I. 47) (hereinafter “Motion”) filed by Defendants Eli Lilly and Company and Michael Anderson. For the reasons discussed, the Motion will be denied.
BACKGROUND
I. Factual Background
Plaintiff Catherine M. Aired (“Aired”) initiated the present action against Defendants Eli Lilly and Company (“Lilly”) and Michael Anderson (“Anderson”) alleging that her employment was terminated as a result of unlawful age discrimination and retaliation.
Aired was hired by Lilly as a Senior Sales Representative on…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Alred v. Eli Lilly and CompanyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2011
- Meltzer v. City of WilmingtonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2013
- Finney v. Cadia Healthcare, LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2021
- Finney v. Delaware Department of TransportationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2024
- Gray v. Kirkwood Dental Associates, P.A.District Court, D. Delaware · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.