Legal Opinion
Roshto v. Chrysler Corp.
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided May 20, 1975No. Civ. A. No. 74-2420PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEEBE, Chief Judge:
This cause came on for hearing on a previous day on the motion of the defendant for the Court to fix a cutoff date for the appearance of additional plaintiffs.
The Court, having heard the arguments of counsel and having studied the legal memoranda submitted by the parties, is now fully advised in the premises and ready to rule. Accordingly,
It is the order of the court that the motion of the defendant, Chrysler Corporation, be, and the same is hereby, granted.
REASONS
In this action, the plaintiff alleges that the defendant has discriminated against her and others similarly…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Burgett v. Cudahy CompanyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1973
- Cherner v. Transitron Electronic CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1962
- Wright v. United States Rubber Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1946
- Maguire v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Shushan v. University of Colorado at BoulderDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1990
- Kinney Shoe Corporation, a New York Corporation v. Bob W. Vorhes and John A. WagnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Haynes v. Singer Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Heagney v. European American BankDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1988
- Partlow v. Jewish Orphans' Home of Southern California, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.