Legal Opinion

Cherner v. Transitron Electronic Corporation

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided February 5, 1962No. Civ. A. 61-857PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WYZANSKI, District Judge.

Purchasers of 200 shares of the stock of the defendant Transitron bring this action under the Securities Act of 1933. The first two counts of the amended complaint rest on § 11 of the Act (15 U.S.C.A. § 77k) and on a statement in each of the two registration statements filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission that Transitron “holds no patent licenses from others requiring the payment of royalties and knows of no patent rights of others which might interfere with the conduct of its business.” The other two counts rest on § 12(2) of the Act (15 U.S.C.A. §…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Deckert v. Independence Shares Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Zahn v. Transamerica CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
  4. York v. Guaranty Trust Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  5. Oppenheimer v. F. J. Young & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Dolgow v. AndersonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1968
  2. William Harris v. Palm Springs Alpine Estates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  3. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  4. Diamond v. OreamunoNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. In Re HOTEL TELEPHONE CHARGESCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API