Legal Opinion
Wright v. United States Rubber Co.
District Court, S.D. Iowa
Decided September 27, 1946No. Civil Actions 548, 568, 571, 575, 576PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DEWEY, District Judge.
These suits are similar in their nature and were instituted by former employees of the defendant corporation seeking to recover under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq.
The actions came on for hearing on motions filed by the defendant to dismiss claims or portions of claims of parties who have intervened in the above entitled actions, on the ground that they are barred by the applicable statute of limitations. The motions being similar the suits were consolidated for the hearing on the motions and were argued in open court at Des Moines, Iowa, on the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Michelsen v. PenneyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Pentland v. Dravo CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
- Culver v. Bell & Loffland, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
- Farmers Co-Op. Oil Co. v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Burgett v. Cudahy CompanyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1973
- Doerr v. WarnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Group Health Inc. v. Blue Cross Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Roshto v. Chrysler Corp.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1975
- Weber v. Mobil Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.