Legal Opinion

Globe Construction Co. v. Yost

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 19, 1932No. 23761. Department OnePublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

On April 14, 1931, plaintiff began an action in ejectment against defendants to quiet title to certain real estate in Snohomish county, Washington, and for damages for withholding possession thereof from plaintiff. Defendants answered by way of general denial, and also by way of an affirmative defense alleging that, in a former action, begun December 11, 1930, they had acquired title to the property through mortgage foreclosure proceedings. Later, defendants, by a separate pleading, incorporated an additional affirmative defense in their answer. Plaintiff filed replies consisting of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Thompson v. McCorkleIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Ex parte SternesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Kalb v. German Savings & Loan SocietyWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Crary v. KurtzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  5. Cully v. ShirkIndiana Supreme Court · 1892

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Thompson v. ShortWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Batey v. BateyWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Globe Construction Co. v. YostWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Valentine v. Portland Timber & Land Holding Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1976
  5. Globe Construction Co. v. YostWashington Supreme Court · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API