Legal Opinion

Globe Construction Co. v. Yost

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1933No. 24462. Department TwoPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

This action was brought to establish title to certain real estate and for the removal of a cloud cast thereon by a judgment in a former action. The answer contained a general denial, three affirmative defenses and a cross-complaint. Issues having been joined, tbe cause proceeded to trial and, upon a hearing before tbe court without a jury, plaintiff’s action was dismissed at tbe conclusion of its evidence. Defendant thereupon submitted evidence upon her cross-complaint, and tbe court thereafter entered its findings, conclusions and judgment dismissing plaintiff’s complaint and quieting title…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Haynes v. Central Business Property Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1926
  2. State Ex Rel. Bowen v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Globe Construction Co. v. YostWashington Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. EvansWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Wax v. Riverview Cemetery Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1942
  3. Pacesetter Real Estate, Inc. v. FasulesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  4. Watts v. Liberty Royalties CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  5. National Grocery Co. v. Kotzebue Fur & Trading Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API