Legal Opinion
Cawdrey v. City of Redondo Beach
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 12, 1993No. B056816PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KLEIN, P. J.
Plaintiffs and appellants Ronald A. Cawdrey (Cawdrey) and Mark Conte (Conte) appeal the judgment denying their petition for writ of mandamus and application for injunctive relief from the refusal of defendants and respondents City of Redondo Beach (the City) and City Clerk John L. Oliver to permit Cawdrey to seek reelection to a third term on the city council.
The primary issues presented are (1) whether article XXVI, section 26 of the Redondo Beach City Charter (charter section 26), limiting the terms of the mayor and city council members, is a “municipal affair” authorized…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. CelebrezzeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Fisher v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Legislature v. EuCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Johnson v. BradleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Dibb v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Nevada Judges Ass'n v. LauNevada Supreme Court · 1996
- Edgerly v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Weiss v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Jeffrey v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.