Legal Opinion
Shemo v. Mayfield Hts.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided February 8, 2000No. 1998-2054PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 88 Ohio St.3d 7.] SHEMO ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. MAYFIELD HEIGHTS ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Shemo v. Mayfield Hts.,
2000-Ohio-258.] Municipal corporations—Zoning–Reinstatement of trial court’s judgment declaring unconstitutional Mayfield Heights’ U-2-A (cluster single- family) zoning classification of an undeveloped 22.6-acre parcel of land. (No. 98-2054–Submitted November 17, 1999–Decided February 9, 2000.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 73241. __________________ {¶ 1} Plaintiffs-appellants Michael Shemo…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Seasons Coal Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Karches v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Gerijo, Inc. v. City of FairfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Blair v. McDonaghOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State ex rel. Shemo v. Mayfield Hts.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. Amberley Village, C-070012 (11-16-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Prokos v. HinesOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- State ex rel. Shemo v. Mayfield Hts.Ohio Supreme Court · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.