Legal Opinion

Viestenz v. Arthur Township

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1964No. 8117PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERICKSTAD, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the District Court of Cass County dated April 12, 1963, which denied an application on the part of Charles and Ingrid Viestenz for an order requiring the defendants to comply with the mandatory injunction heretofore entered in this case.

In. 1950 the present petitioners as plaintiffs brought .an action against the township and its supervisors, alleging that the township had reconstructed certain public highways bordering the plaintiffs’ property in such a manner that the highways obstructed the natural flow and drainage of surface water,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Viestenz v. Arthur TownshipNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Ritter v. Drainage District No. 1Nebraska Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Halsrud v. BrodaleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Huber v. Oliver CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Rynestad v. ClemetsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Martin v. WeckerlyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Ness v. Ward County Water Resource DistrictNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API