Legal Opinion

Halsrud v. Brodale

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 26, 1956No. 49015PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtOliver, J.

Plaintiff and defendant own adjoining lands in a private drainage district. By the contract of the landowners under which it was established in 1916, this drainage district is limited to land in Section 35 only. A tile main starts in plaintiff’s land and runs into defendant’s land and across other lands to the *1048district outlet. Plaintiff recently tiled the North Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 2, which adjoins his land in Section 35, and connected that tile main with the tile main of the private drainage district, in his land in Section 35. Thereafter defendant obstructed the tile…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Halsrud v. BrodaleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1955

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Viestenz v. Arthur TownshipNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API