Legal Opinion
Martin v. Weckerly
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided March 13, 1985No. Civ. 10696PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
YANDE WALLE, Acting Chief Justice.
The defendants, Norman D. Weckerly and Mattie Lou Weckerly (Weckerly), appealed a district court judgment awarding plaintiffs Huida Martin, Mary Ann Hanson, and Harry C. Hanson (Hanson) compensatory and injunctive relief for damage to their property caused by drainage of surface water onto their land by Weckerly. We affirm.
Huida Martin and her daughter, Mary Ann Hanson, own property in Sheridan County which is farmed by Mary Ann’s husband, Harry Hanson. Weckerly owns and farms land which is adjacent to and upstream from Hanson’s land.
The property involved in…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Layman v. Braunschweigische Maschinenbauanstalt, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- Enderson v. KelehanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Hall GMC, Inc. v. Crane Carrier Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- Schmidt v. Plains Electric, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- Moum v. MaerckleinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Locklin v. City of LafayetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Lang v. WonnenbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- N. D. Private Investigative & Sec. Bd. v. Tigerswan, LLCNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- G & D Enterprises v. LiebeltNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Benson County Water Resource DistrictNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.