Legal Opinion
Loke v. Loke
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 25, 1950No. Civ. 14279PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHOTTKY, J. pro tem.
On January 25, 1949, plaintiff and respondent Anna Loke filed an action for divorce against defendant and appellant Edward Loke. On February 21, 1949, plaintiff’s application for counsel fees and costs was heard before the Honorable Frank T. Deasy, Judge of the Superior Court, and denied. Thereafter, on February 23, 1949, plaintiff filed a notice of appeal from the order of Judge Deasy, and on March 30 she filed a motion for an order requiring defendant to pay $350 to plaintiff as and for attorney’s fees and costs on said appeal. This motion was heard by Superior Court…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kenney v. KenneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Tremper v. TremperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- Sweeley v. SweeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Loeb v. LoebCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Busch v. BuschCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gerard A. Cruz, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Carmelita C. Cruz, Defendant/Counterclaimant-AppellantSupreme Court of Guam · 2022
- Simon v. SimonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Bruner v. BrunerSuperior Court of Guam · 2020
- Hayashi v. HayashiSuperior Court of Guam · 2020