Legal Opinion

Hayashi v. Hayashi

Superior Court of Guam

Decided December 11, 2020No. DM0219-20Unknown

1Opinion of the Court

FILED SUPERIOR COURT OF GUAM 2020 DEC 11 AN % 06 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF GUAM CLERK OF FOURT BY: GABRIEL K.R. HAYASHI, Superior Court Case No. DM0219-20 Plaintiff, DECISION & ORDER RE MOTION VS. FOR PENDENTE LITE SPOUSAL JOYCELYNN A.H. HAYASHI, SUPPORT AND ATTORNEY’S FEES Defendant. The Court here considers Defendant Joycelynn Hayashi’s Motion for Pendente Lite Spousal Support and Attorney Fees. After reviewing the briefs and the relevant law, the Court finds that additional spousal support is not warranted, but that Plaintiff Gabriel K.R. Hayashi should contribute to Defendant’s attorney’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Leupe v. LeupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Nunes v. NunesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Mueller v. MuellerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Rosenthal v. RosenthalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Millington v. MillingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API