Legal Opinion

Bell v. Henson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 12, 1934No. 1487PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALEXANDER, Justice.

R. L. Henson, for a consideration of $1,600 in cash, conveyed to Leo Bell an undivided three-fourths interest in the minerals or oil royalties in 54.2 acres of land in Smith county. Pie later brought this suit against Bell to cancel said conveyance and for damages, alleging that he had been induced to execute said conveyance as the result of fraud perpetrated on him by the defendant Bell. 1-Ie alleged in effect that he resided in the state of Kansas and was wholly unfamiliar with oil developments and the value of mineral rights in Smith county where the land in question was…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Fitzhugh v. Franco-Texas Land Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. StrycharskiTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Henne & Meyer v. MoultrieTexas Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Kaiser v. NummerdorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  5. North v. Atlas Brick Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1929

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Fredonia Broadcasting Corporation, Inc. v. Rca CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  2. Howard v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  3. Jordan v. City of LubbockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  4. Smith v. Harrison CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  5. Lewis v. River Oaks Capital CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API