Legal Opinion

Kaiser v. Nummerdor

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1904PublishedCited by 34 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of tbe circuit court for Dane-county: K. Gr. SiebecKEe, Circuit Judge. Action for damages from deceit inducing plaintiff to purchase a stock of boots and shoes at an agreed value of $7,000. The jury found by 'special verdict that the defendant falsely represented to the plaintiff that such stock inventoried at the-amount of $8,500 by the inventory made by one Klug, with the intent and object to induce plaintiff to rely upon it as true anff to purchase;…

Read the full summary

Appeal from a judgment of tbe circuit court for Dane-county: K. Gr. SiebecKEe, Circuit Judge. Action for damages from deceit inducing plaintiff to purchase a stock of boots and shoes at an agreed value of $7,000. The jury found by 'special verdict that the defendant falsely represented to the plaintiff that such stock inventoried at the-amount of $8,500 by the inventory made by one Klug, with the intent and object to induce plaintiff to rely upon it as true anff to purchase; that the plaintiff understood and believed such to be the fact, and was thereby induced to buy the stock. The inventory…

1Opinion of the CourtDodge, J.

The first position assumed by appellant is that ■there was no evidence to support a negative answer to question 4 of the special verdict. The representation was that King’s inventory showed a total value of $8,531. Upon reaching the store where the goods were, plaintiff — who, by the way, was quick at figures, familiar with inventories, and largely experienced in estimating and buying stocks — asked for that inventory; and it was delivered to him, and retained a.considerable time, while he selected numerous illustrative items, and examined the particular goods represented thereby, with the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bostwick v. Mutual Life Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Cawley v. La Crosse City Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Shaw v. GilbertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Warner v. BenjaminWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Locke v. WilliamsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Standard Manufacturing Co. v. SlotWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Miranovitz v. GeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
  3. J. H. Clark Co. v. RiceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Jacobsen v. WhitelyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Johnson v. AllenUtah Supreme Court · 1945

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API