Legal Opinion

Henne & Meyer v. Moultrie

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1903No. 1259PublishedCited by 55 opinions

Questions certified from the Court of Civil Appeals for the Third District, in an appeal from Milam County.

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Associate Justice.

This is a certified question from the Court of Civil Appeals for the Third Supreme Judicial District. The statement and questions are as follows: •

“Appellants, Henne & Meyer, sued appellee, Paul Moultrie, on a promissory note for $23.45, with interest and collection fees and to foreclose a chattel mortgage included in the same instrument with the note.
“Appellee plead general denial, payment and certain counterclaims, and in jreconvention for damages.
“The case originated in the justice court hut was appealed to and tried by the county court, and the amount in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ablowich v. Greenville Natl. Bank.Texas Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. StrycharskiTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Patrick v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Hobart v. HobartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
  5. Stevens v. Heirs of MastersonTexas Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Hines v. ParksTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Massie v. HutchesonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  3. Fant v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  4. Houston Belt & Terminal v. LynchTexas Commission of Appeals · 1920
  5. Graves v. McCollum LewisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API