Legal Opinion

Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. Strycharski

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1896No. 457PublishedCited by 64 opinions

Error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the First District, in an appeal from Harris County. Strycharski sued Dillingham, receiver of the Houston & Texas Central Railway Company, and the Houston & Texas Central Railway Company, the purchaser of the property at a receiver’s sale, to recover for personal injuries received as an employe of the receiver. Plaintiff had judgment against the company, but the trial court directed a verdict in favor of the receiver.

Read the full summary

Error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the First District, in an appeal from Harris County. Strycharski sued Dillingham, receiver of the Houston & Texas Central Railway Company, and the Houston & Texas Central Railway Company, the purchaser of the property at a receiver’s sale, to recover for personal injuries received as an employe of the receiver. Plaintiff had judgment against the company, but the trial court directed a verdict in favor of the receiver. The company appealed, Strycharski filing' cross-assignments of error, upon which the Court of Civil Appeals, while affirming the judgment…

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Associate Justice.

The Circuit Court of the United States at Galveston, Texas, appointed Charles Dillingham receiver of the property of the Houston & Texas Central Eailroad Company. The date of the appointment is not material to the question involved. On the 4th day of May, 1888, that court entered a decree ordering that the railroad be sold for the payment of certain bonds which were foreclosed upon it. The property was sold September 8, 1888, being purchased by F. P. Oleott for himself and associates, and the sale was confirmed December 4, 1888, and the court directed a deed to be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Clark Loftus v. PearceTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Lloyd v. BrinckTexas Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Claiborne v. TannerTexas Supreme Court · 1856
  4. Wise v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Jones v. FortuneIllinois Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Wisdom v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. CantyTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Eastham v. HunterTexas Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Fant v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  5. Henne & Meyer v. MoultrieTexas Supreme Court · 1903

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API