Legal Opinion
J. D. & H. Enterprises Corp. v. Byrne
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 12, 1958PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMiles F. McDonald, J.
The defendant Byrne and the defendants Donovan and Thomas each move this court for an order pursuant to rule 106 of the Buies of Civil Practice dismissing the first, second and third causes of action set forth in the amended complaint on the ground that each of them fails to state a cause of action against the said defendants. Plaintiff seeks to recover judgment against the three defendants for an alleged breach of contract.
Defendant Byrne and the Bay Bidge Amusement Co. entered into an agreement, dated August 1, 1955, whereby said defend*1067ant authorized the Amusement Company to install a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Oscar Schlegel Manufacturing Co. v. Peter Cooper's Glue FactoryNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Topken, Loring & Schwartz, Inc. v. SchwartzNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Strobe v. Netherland Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
- Apex Leasing Co. v. LitkeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- Apex Leasing Company v. . LitkeNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Estate of Bogley v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- Robert L. Haag, Inc. v. Swift & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Southern Vending Co. v. HallockDade County Small Claims Court · 1963