Southern Vending Co. v. Hallock

SIDNEY L. SEGALL, Judge.

Judgment is rendered in favor of defendant. Under the law and the evidence plaintiff is not entitled to recover.

The plaintiff seeks to recover a loss of profits for removal of its cigarette vending machine from a location on which plaintiff had placed said machine under a “Location Agreement”. The machine was removed by the plaintiff at the request of the purchaser of the business operated at said location. Plaintiff contends that it is entitled to recover on the basis of a breach of the “Location Agreement” or as a creditor under the Bulk Sales Law, which plaintiff…