Legal Opinion
Topken, Loring & Schwartz, Inc. v. Schwartz
New York Court of Appeals
Decided November 20, 1928PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrane, J.
The plaintiff has brought action on a contract for the repurchase of stock. It is .a sales contract, not a contract of employment, although there be an intimation that the defendant had been an employee of the plaintiff. Without repeating all the allegations of the formal instrument made the first day of June, 1922, between the Loring Glove Co., Inc., a domestic corporation, and Julius L. Schwartz of the city of New York, it will meet our purposes to state that' the Loring Glove Co. sells and transfers to said Schwartz 114 shares of its capital stock for $11,400, with the privilege of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Oscar Schlegel Manufacturing Co. v. Peter Cooper's Glue FactoryNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Richards v. Ernst Wiener Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
- McIntyre v. E. Bement's SonsMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Fremont Carriage Manufacturing Co. v. ThomsenNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
- Strodl v. Farish-Stafford Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Brown v. Little, Brown & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Weiner v. Pictorial Paper Package Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- In re the Arbitration between Riccardi & Modern Silver Linen Supply Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- Mountain State Steel Foundries, Inc., and v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, AndCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1960
- Cohn v. Mishkoff Costello Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.