Legal Opinion

Apex Leasing Company v. . Litke

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 10, 1918PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from a judgment entered June 23, 1916, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term and directing a dismissal of the complaint. The judgment at Special Term set aside a certain sale of merchandise in bulk as void under section 44 of the Personal Property Law.

Read the full summary

Appeal from a judgment entered June 23, 1916, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term and directing a dismissal of the complaint. The judgment at Special Term set aside a certain sale of merchandise in bulk as void under section 44 of the Personal Property Law. One Samuel Litke, the owner of two stores, sold one of them to defendant. At the time of the sale he gave to the purchaser a list of his creditors,- but did not include the name…

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Collin, Cuddeback, Cardozo, Pound, Crane and Andrews, JJ.

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Sunrise Industrial Joint Venture v. Ditric Optics, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1995
  2. Coon v. DossIllinois Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Chemical Bank v. Society Brand Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
  4. Wyman, Partridge & Co. v. TierneyWyoming Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Braun v. American Laundry MacH. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1932

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API