Legal Opinion
Herbert v. Layman
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided April 5, 1966No. 1189PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShangraw, J.
This is a civil action sounding in tort brought by the plaintiffs, husband and wife. The complaint alleges that the plaintiff, Courtland Herbert, and the defendants were each employees of Mt. Snow Development Corporation, and while so employed by the common employer, and through the negligence of the defendants, Mr. Herbert was injured and seeks recovery of the defendants for damages arising therefrom.
The common employer was insured under the workmen’s compensation law of Vermont. Chapter 9, 21 V.S.A. Plaintiff, Courtland Herbert, was receiving the benefits afforded by the act at the time…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bresnahan v. BarreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Murphy v. MiettinenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
- Caira v. CairaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Baldwin v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1965
- Merchants Mutual Casualty Co. v. TuttleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1953
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Deems v. Western Maryland Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
- State Ex Rel. Badami v. GaertnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
- Libercent v. AldrichSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
- Defoe v. PhillipSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2012
- Smith v. DesautelsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.