Smith v. Desautels
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.
¶ 1. Plaintiff, Carl Smith, was working for defendants, Desautels House Movers, Inc. and Emile Desautels, when an acetylene tank fell on his hand and crushed it. Although defendants did not have workers’ compensation insurance, they paid for workers’ compensation benefits claimed and received by plaintiff. After exhausting his benefits, plaintiff brought this suit, seeking damages for defendants’ negligence. The superior court granted summary judgment for defendants, concluding that plaintiff had made a binding election to claim compensation pursuant to 21 V.S.A. § 618(b) and was, therefore,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Clements v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
- Gallipo v. City of RutlandSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
- State v. OscarsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
- Colwell v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
- Employers Mutual Companies v. SkillingIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Meyncke v. MeynckeSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
- In re Application of Lathrop Limited Partnership I, II and IIISupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
- Letourneau v. A.N. Deringer/Wausau InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
- In re Carrigan Conditional Use and Certificate of Compliance, Certificate of Occupancy, Certificate of ComplianceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
- State v. Kimberly LoveSupreme Court of Vermont · 2017
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.