Legal Opinion

Calvine Cotton Mills, Inc. v. Textile Workers Union

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 2, 1953No. 541PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaRNhill, J.

The only exceptive assignments of error contained in the record are these: (1) “The plaintiff: assigns as error the refusal of the Court to grant the relief prayed for by the plaintiff,” and (2) “the plaintiff further assigns as error the action of the Court in rendering and signing the judgment appearing in the record.”

These exceptive assignments of error are most general in terms and constitute a broadside attack on the judgment. Vestal v. Vending Machine Co., 219 N.C. 468, 14 S.E. 2d 427. The exception to the judgment in effect asserts that the award and the facts found by the court are…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lee v. . Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  2. Town of Burnsville v. BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. Vestal v. Moseley Vending MacHine Exchange, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  4. Redwine v. . ClodfelterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  5. In Re the Receivership of Port Publishing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Farley v. Zapata Coal Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Nello L. Teer Co. v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. Autoridad Sobre Hogares v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1961
  4. Charlotte City Coach Lines, Inc. v. Brotherhood of Railroad TrainmenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  5. Briggs v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API