Charlotte City Coach Lines, Inc. v. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
DEMURRER ORE TENUS FILED IN SUPREME COURT.
N.C.G.S., §95-36.6 — Appointment of arbitrators reads in part: "The arbitrator or arbitration panel, as the case may be, shall have such powers and duties as are conferred by the voluntary agreement of the parties, and, if there is no agreement to the contrary, shall have power to decide the arbitrability as well as the merits of the dispute.”
N.C.G.S., §95-36.9(b) reads: “Any party against whom arbitration proceedings have been initiated may, within 10 days after receiving written notice of the issue or questions to be passed upon at the arbitration…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Cone v. Union Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
- Jorgensen v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Local No. 149 of the American Federation of Technical Engineers (Afl) v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1957
- Town of Blowing Rock v. GregorieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Cortez v. Ford Motor CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Peoples v. Cone Mills Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- A.E.P. Industries, Inc. v. McClureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- Rodgers Builders, Inc. v. McQueenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Ellison v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- Sale v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.