Legal Opinion

Redwine v. . Clodfelter

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 22, 1946PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.

The only exception in the record is to the signing of the judgment. This exception presents the single question whether the facts found by the court are sufficient to support the judgment, or, stated differently, whether the court correctly applied the law to the facts found. Rader v. Coach Co., 225 N. C., 537; Fox v. Mills, Inc., 225 N. C., 580; Lee v. Board of Adjustment, ante, 107; King v. Rudd, ante, 156; Shuford v. Building & Loan Asso., 210 N. C., 237, 186 S. E., 352.

“Family agreements looking to the advantageous settlement of estates or to the adjustment of family differences, disputes…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Rader v. Queen City Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  2. Fox v. Cramerton Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  3. Reynolds Ex Rel. Cannon v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  4. Penick v. Bank of WadesboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Bohannon v. TrotmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Davison v. Duke UniversitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  2. Carter v. KemptonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. Cocke v. Duke UniversitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Sigmund Sternberger Foundation, Inc. v. TannenbaumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. Halifax Paper Co. v. Roanoke Rapids Sanitary DistrictSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API