Legal Opinion

Parsons v. Segno

California Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 1921No. L. A. No. 6256PublishedCited by 13 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Dana R. Weller, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLawlor, J.

This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff for $3,509.11 and costs, being the full amount demanded in an action in three counts to recover the sum of $250, with interest, on each of two promissory notes signed by the defendant, as maker, and the sum of $2,160.61, with interest, on an alleged account stated.

In June, 1911, appellant retained respondent as her attorney for the purpose of bringing an action for divorce against her husband, A. Victor Segno, effecting a property settlement with him, and looking after other legal business for her. The divorce was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Auzerais v. NagleeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Bennett v. PotterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Newman v. FreitasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Terry v. SicklesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  5. Crane v. StansburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Trafton v. YoungbloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Hill v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Foster v. DwireNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Theisen v. KeoughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Ayres v. LipschutzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API