Legal Opinion

Cedillo v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

California Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1971No. L.A. 29849PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PETERS, J.

Petitioner sustained a back injury in the course and scope of his employment on November 12, 1964. He was then 36 years of age. On January 21, 1966, the referee, pursuant to stipulations of the parties issued an award' granting petitioner permanent disability of 8% percent after apportionment. Medical-legal costs were also awarded. There was no provision for medical treatment.

Petitioner then petitioned to reopen the case, and on February 3, 1967, the referee issued supplemental findings and award finding that petitioner needed further medical treatment and that his condition…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Granado v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Zemke v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. U.S. Auto Stores v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Braewood Convalescent Hospital v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Griffith v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. Nicky Blair's Restaurant v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  4. Beverly Hills Multispecialty Group, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API