Legal Opinion
Beverly Hills Multispecialty Group, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 7, 1994No. Docket Nos. B077475, B077476, B077478, B077479, B077480, B077481, B077482, B077485, B077486, B077487PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CROSKEY, J.
— Petitioner, Beverly Hills Multispecialty Group, Inc. (BHMG), sought writs of review in 10 cases in which respondent Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (Board) affirmed orders denying BHMG’s lien claims for medical treatment and medical-legal costs. In each case, the allegedly injured worker filed a claim form or application alleging a cumulative industrial injury after the worker’s employment with respondent International Rectifier was terminated, and the workers’ compensation judge (WCJ) found that the worker did not sustain a cumulative industrial injury. 1 We issued…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hegglin v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Spector v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Redner v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Subsequent Injuries Fund v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Cedillo v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- CHARLES J. VACANTI v. State Comp. Ins. FundCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Boehm & Associates v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Barri v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Hand Rehabilitation Center v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Chorn v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.