Employers Mutual Liability Insurance v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROUSE, J.
In this writ of review proceeding, we are called upon to determine procedures to be employed in making supplemental awards of attorney’s fees for legal services performed in appellate proceedings in workers’ compensation cases.
The matter arose when, following our summary denial of an employer’s petition for a writ of review, the prevailing employee sought hearing in our Supreme Court on his request for an award of attorney’s fees. In its answer to the petition, the Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board (hereinafter “board”) suggested that some guidance with respect to the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- LeVesque v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Smith v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- U.S. Auto Stores v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Cedillo v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- California Compensation & Fire Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Johnson v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Klee v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Aliano v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Los Angeles Unified School District v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.