Legal Opinion

Vince v. Crane Co., Unpublished Decision (3-15-2007)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 15, 2007No. 87955UnpublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION

{¶ 1} The estate of plaintiff-appellant Nathalie Vince1 appeals from summary judgments entered against it on asbestos claims it made against defendant-appellees Crane Company, Goodyear Tire Rubber Company, and Owens-Illinois, Inc.2 The estate argues that it presented a triable issue of fact on the issue of whether Vince's second-hand exposure to asbestos products manufactured by the defendants constituted a substantial factor in her death caused by mesothelioma. We conclude that the court did not err by granting the summary judgments because the estate failed to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pang v. MinchOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Horton v. Harwick Chem. Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
  4. Goldman v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Minnich v. Ashland Oil Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fisher v. Alliance Machine Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Maddy v. Honeywell Internatl., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. Dicenzo v. A-Best Prods. Co., Inc., 88583 (6-28-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Rahmes v. Adience Inc., 88427 (8-23-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API