Vince v. Crane Co., Unpublished Decision (3-15-2007)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION
{¶ 1} The estate of plaintiff-appellant Nathalie Vince1 appeals from summary judgments entered against it on asbestos claims it made against defendant-appellees Crane Company, Goodyear Tire Rubber Company, and Owens-Illinois, Inc.2 The estate argues that it presented a triable issue of fact on the issue of whether Vince's second-hand exposure to asbestos products manufactured by the defendants constituted a substantial factor in her death caused by mesothelioma. We conclude that the court did not err by granting the summary judgments because the estate failed to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pang v. MinchOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Horton v. Harwick Chem. Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995
- Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
- Goldman v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
- Minnich v. Ashland Oil Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fisher v. Alliance Machine Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Maddy v. Honeywell Internatl., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
- Dicenzo v. A-Best Prods. Co., Inc., 88583 (6-28-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Rahmes v. Adience Inc., 88427 (8-23-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007