Legal Opinion

Minnich v. Ashland Oil Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1984No. 84-469PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJ. P. Celebrezze, J.

In this case we are faced with determining whether Ohio should adopt the doctrine of alternative liability set forth in 2 Restatement of the Law 2d, Torts (1965) 441-442, Section 433(B)(3). For the following reasons, we have determined that fairness demands application of that doctrine to situations similar to the case at bar.

Section 433(B)(3) is an exception to the general rule that the burden of proof of proximate cause rests with the plaintiff. That section states:

“Where the conduct of two or more actors is tortious, and it is proved that harm has been caused to the plaintiff by only one…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gedra v. Dallmer Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Dolly Madison Leasing & Furniture Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Horton v. Harwick Chemical Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. In Re Bendectin Litigation.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  3. Horton v. Harwick Chem. Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. New Jersey Turnpike Authority v. Ppg Industries, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  5. Huston v. KoniecznyOhio Supreme Court · 1990

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API