Legal Opinion

State v. Conger

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 11, 1994No. CC 90-10-1676-C CA A72340, CC 91-01-1702-C CA A71205 and SC S40908PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*487VAN HOOMISSEN, J.

Article VII (Amended), section 5(2), of the Oregon Constitution, provides:

“A grand jury shall consist of seven jurors chosen by lot from the whole number of jurors in attendance at the court, five of whom must concur to find an indictment.”

The issue in these consolidated cases is whether that provision requires that seven grand jurors hear evidence to find an indictment for that indictment to be constitutionally valid. The Court of Appeals held that an indictment found by fewer than seven grand jurors violated Article VII (Amended), section 5(2), and reversed and remanded…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Priest v. PearceOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. PrattOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. OstranderSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
  4. Zockert v. FanningOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. GortmakerOregon Supreme Court · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Yancy v. ShatzerOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Li v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. BarrettOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State v. HajiOregon Supreme Court · 2020
  5. State v. SwansonOregon Supreme Court · 2011

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API