Legal Opinion

Carleton Mining & Milling Co. v. Ryan

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1902No. 3926PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Lake County. On petition for rehearing.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gabbert

This action was commenced by appellee to recover of appellant damages resulting from the death of her son, caused by the alleged negligence of the company. The latter denied that it was guilty of negligence, and contended that the death of the son was the result of his own negligence and that of his fellow servants. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, he defendant appeals.

*403Deceased was killed by a stull falling down a shaft, in which he was employed by the company. The vital proposition involved, as presented by the assignment of errors, argued by counsel for appellant, is, whether or not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Grant v. VarneySupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
  2. Denver & Rio Grande Railroad v. SipesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1899
  3. Denver & Rio Grande Railroad v. SipesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1896

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Thayer v. Denver & Rio Grande R. R.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Gregoric v. Percy-LaSalle Mining & Power Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1912
  3. Portland Gold Mining Co. v. O'HaraSupreme Court of Colorado · 1909
  4. Rio Grande Southern Railroad v. NicholsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1912
  5. Great Western Sugar Co. v. ParkerColorado Court of Appeals · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API