Legal Opinion

Gregoric v. Percy-LaSalle Mining & Power Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1912No. 6925PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to Pueblo- District Court.—Hon. C. S. Essex, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice GabberT

Plaintiff in error brought suit to recover damages sustained on account of the death of her husband claimed to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant. At the conclusion of the evidence on the part of plaintiff, the court directed a verdict in favor of defendant. The motion for such verdict was sustained by the court for the reasons, that the deceased had voluntarily gone into a place of danger, had assumed the risk of the injury which resulted in his death, and was guilty of contributory negligence. Plaintiff brings the case here for review. •

The evidence, in substance, was, that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Denver & Rio Grande Railroad v. SpencerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1900
  2. Jackson v. CrillySupreme Court of Colorado · 1891
  3. Virginia Bridge & Iron Co. v. JordanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
  4. Carleton Mining & Milling Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1902
  5. Burnside v. PetersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Arps v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  2. Wilson v. GordonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
  3. Colonna Shipyard, Inc. v. BlandSupreme Court of Virginia · 1928
  4. Sprague v. HerbelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1931
  5. Wintermute v. Oregon-Wash. R. & N. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1921

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API