Ayala v. Lockheed Martin Corp.
Superior Court of The Virgin Islands
1Opinion of the Court
WILLOCKS, Administrative Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
(March 3, 2017)
BEFORE THE COURT is a motion filed by Defendant Lockheed Martin Corporation (“Lockheed Martin”) to consolidate nineteen cases *293together. Plaintiff Carmelo Ayala did not file a response. Defendant General Engineering Corporation (“GEC”) also did not file a response, but because Lockheed Martin failed to serve GEC with a copy of its motion. Notwithstanding this deficiency, the Court will proceed to rule on Lockheed Martin’s motion, rather than order service on GEC and await a response, because Ayala (and the eighteen other…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Johnson v. Manhattan Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Lockett v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
- Alford v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Rankin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- in the Interest of E.A. and D.A., ChildrenTexas Supreme Court · 2009
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Augustin v. Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corp.Superior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2017
- Carmelo Ayala v. Lockheed Martin Corporation, individually and as successor-in-interest to Martin Marietta Corporation; Martin Marietta Aluminum, Inc., and Martin Marietta Aluminum Properties, Inc.; Martin Marietta Corporation individually and as successor-in-interest to Martin Marietta Aluminum, Inc.; and Martin Marietta Aluminum Properties, Inc.; Martin Marietta Aluminum, Inc.; Martin Marietta Aluminum Properties, Inc.; and General Engineering CorporationSuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2020
- John Barbell v. Amerada Hess Corporation; Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corporation; Litwin Corporation; and Universal Oil Products also known as U.O.P.Superior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2020
- Matthews v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2022