Legal Opinion

in the Interest of E.A. and D.A., Children

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 2009No. 08-0157PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Jefferson

joined by Justice HECHT, Justice O’NEILL, Justice MEDINA, Justice GREEN, and Justice JOHNSON.

In Weaver v. Hartford, Accident and Indemnity Co., 570 S.W.2d 367, 370 (Tex.1978), we held that “a new citation is necessary for a party who has not appeared when the plaintiff, by amended petition, seeks a more onerous judgment than prayed for in the original pleading.” In 1990, however, Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 21a was amended to provide for a variety of methods of service, including certified or registered mail, for all pleadings and court papers except the original petition. We must decide…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Peralta v. Heights Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Cliff v. HugginsTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Co. v. Drewery Construction Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Weaver v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Co. v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Ex Parte SinegarCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
  3. Estate of Paul Edward Check, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2014
  4. Elite Door & Trim, Inc. v. TapiaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2011
  5. Brown v. Ogbolu, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2011

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API