Legal Opinion

Geff Stringer v. William Robinson

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 2013No. 40087Published

1Opinion of the Court

W. JONES, Justice.

I. Nature of the Case

The Idaho Industrial Commission (the Commission) held that a statutory employer, Russell Griffeth, was not liable for payments under Idaho’s worker’s compensation law because the claimant, Geffary Stringer, fell within the “casual employment” exemption set forth in I.C. § 72-212(2). Stringer contests the Commission’s application of the “casual employment” exemption, arguing statutory employers, unlike direct employers, are not subject to the “casual employment” exemption. We disagree and affirm the Commission’s decision.

II. Factual and Procedural…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Robison v. Bateman-Hall, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Anderson v. GaileyIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Mazzone v. Texas Roadhouse, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Venters v. Sorrento Delaware, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Fuhriman v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API