Legal Opinion

Fuhriman v. State

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 2007No. 31974, 32224, 32225PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURDICK, Justice.

This case asks the Court to determine whether immunity from a tort suit based on qualification as a statutory employer is an affirmative defense and if so, whether it is waived if not pleaded. This case also asks the Court to determine whether a category one statutory employer under Worker’s Compensation Law must be a general contractor or subcontractor and whether a category one statutory employer must exercise a certain degree of control over the work site or the employees working there.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On August 23, 2001, an accident occurred during a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Robison v. Bateman-Hall, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Runcorn v. Shearer Lumber Products, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Venters v. Sorrento Delaware, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Kolar v. Cassia County IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Bluestone v. MathewsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Williams v. Leone & Keeble, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Williams v. Leone & Keeble, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Joseph Bolognese v. Paul ForteIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Guzman v. Piercy / Canyon County / SuttonIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Valiant Idaho v. VP IncorporatedIdaho Supreme Court · 2018

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API