Legal Opinion

Mazzone v. Texas Roadhouse, Inc.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 2013No. 39337PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUBSTITUTE OPINION,

THE COURT’S PRIOR OPINION DATED APRIL 26, 2013 IS HEREBY WITHDRAWN

W. JONES, Justice.

I. Nature of the Case

This is an appeal from an order of the Idaho Industrial Commission (“Commission”) denying Appellant, Matthew Mazzone (“Mazzone”), workers’ compensation pursuant to I.C. § 72-451 for psychological injuries allegedly arising as a result of an industrial accident wherein Mazzone tripped and fell into a deep fat fryer while employed at Texas Roadhouse. Mazzone contends the Commission’s order is not based on substantial and competent evidence.

II. Factual and Procedural…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Radio Officers' Union of the Commercial Telegraphers Union v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Int. Com. Comm. v. Louis. & Nash. RRSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. The Chicago Junction CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1924

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Serrano v. Four Seasons FramingIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Fonseca v. Corral Agriculture, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Corgatelli v. Steel West, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Andrews v. State, Industrial Special Indemnity FundIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Boyd-Davis v. Macomber Law, PLLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2015

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API