Legal Opinion

United States v. General Display Case Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 26, 1934No. 3708Published

1Opinion of the Court

Graham, Presiding Judge,

delivered tbe opinion of tbe court:

Merchandise, described in tbe two entries as “illuminating glassware”, and in tbe accompanying invoices as “Hudnut — displays— bollow glass units of cylindrical shape of ord. opalized glass with colored decalcomania ”, was imported at tbe port of New York. It was classified by the collector, in each instance, as “globes or shades, composed in chief value of glass, for use in connection with artificial illumination”, at 70 per centum ad valorem under subparagraph (c) of para-' graph 218, Tariff Act of 1930, which, so far as material,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Rockhill & VietorCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
  2. Solomon v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  3. United States v. BlochCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  4. United States v. WyleCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  5. United States v. KoonsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API