Legal Opinion

United States v. Bloch

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 14, 1925No. 2470PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBakbeR, Judge

Paragraph 218 of the Tariff Act of 1922 contains various provisions for the classification and assessment of duty upon articles composed wholly or in chief value of glass or paste and combinations thereof.

*6For the purposes of this case, it is only necessary to refer to two provisions in the paragraph. They are here inserted under our subdivisions (a) and (b).(a) * * * illuminating articles of every description, including chimneys, globes, shades, and prisms, for use in connection with artificial illumination, all of the foregoing, finished or unfinished, composed wholly or in chief value of…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Furniture Import Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  2. United States v. WyleCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  3. United States v. KoonsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  4. Marks & Rosenfeld, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1943
  5. L. Tobert Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API