United States v. Wyle
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge
The two competing portions of paragraph 218 of the Tariff Act of 1922, involved in this case, are as follows:
Par. 218. * * * illuminating articles . of every description, including chimneys, globes, shades, and prisms, for use in connection with artificial illumination, all of the foregoing, finished or unfinished, composed wholly or in chief value of .glass or paste, or a combination of glass and paste, 60 per centum ad valorem; * * *
*298Par. 218. * * * table and kitchen articles and utensils, and all articles of every description not specially provided for, composed -wholly or in chief value of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Solomon v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- United States v. BlochCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
3Cited by7 opinions
- Marks & Rosenfeld, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1943
- Gold-Silver & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
- L. Tobert Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
- Umann v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1945
- United States v. General Display Case Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.