Legal Opinion

United States v. Wyle

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 14, 1926No. 2778PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge

The two competing portions of paragraph 218 of the Tariff Act of 1922, involved in this case, are as follows:

Par. 218. * * * illuminating articles . of every description, including chimneys, globes, shades, and prisms, for use in connection with artificial illumination, all of the foregoing, finished or unfinished, composed wholly or in chief value of .glass or paste, or a combination of glass and paste, 60 per centum ad valorem; * * *

*298Par. 218. * * * table and kitchen articles and utensils, and all articles of every description not specially provided for, composed -wholly or in chief value of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Solomon v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  2. United States v. BlochCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Marks & Rosenfeld, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1943
  2. Gold-Silver & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
  3. L. Tobert Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
  4. Umann v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1945
  5. United States v. General Display Case Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API