Legal Opinion

United States v. Koons

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 5, 1927No. 2976PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

Urn-shaped lamp bases composed of highly polished black glass were assessed for duty by the collector at the port of Philadelphia at 60 per centum ad valorem as illuminating articles for use in connection with artificial illumination under paragraph 218 of the Tariff Act of 1922. The provision reads as follows:

Par. 218. * * * illuminating articles of every description, including chimneys, globes, shades, and prisms, for use in connection with artificial illumination, all of the foregoing, finished or unfinished, composed wholly or in chief value of glass or pasto, or a combination of glass…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Solomon v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  2. United States v. BlochCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hudson Merchandise Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  2. Prescolite Mfgr. Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  3. L. Tobert Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
  4. United States v. General Display Case Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934
  5. Weiss v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API