Legal Opinion

Forbis v. Reilly

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 28, 1988No. Civ. A. 85-2404PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GERALD J. WEBER, District Judge.

This suit arises from several transactions in which plaintiffs sold to defendant 3 purebred Arabian horses. Plaintiffs sued for payment of balance due on 2 sales and defendant countersued with charges of fraud. Plaintiffs have filed a motion for summary judgment and defendant responded. The parties have submitted lengthy deposition transcripts, other evidentiary materials and briefs. After a review of the record we conclude that there is no disputed issue of fact on any of the three transactions and summary judgment in favor of plaintiffs on all issues…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Berkebile v. Brantly Helicopter Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Delahanty v. First Pennsylvania Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Shane v. HoffmannSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Sessa v. RiegleDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Emery v. Third Nat. Bk. of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Continental Bank, N.A. v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  2. Peerless Wall & Window Coverings, Inc. v. Synchronics, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Richie & Pat Bonvie Stables, Inc. v. IrvingNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
  4. Taylor v. Peoples Natural Gas Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Whelan v. Careercom Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API