Legal Opinion

Emery v. Third Nat. Bk. of Pittsburgh

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 23, 1934No. Appeal, 89PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Maxey,

Plaintiff has recovered three successive verdicts in this case. The verdict in the first trial was set aside and a new trial granted. Judgment on a verdict was entered in the second trial, and an appeal was taken to this court. We ordered a new trial. At the third trial the plaintiff secured a verdict in the sum of $11,587.90. The defendant made motions for judgment n. o. v. and for a new trial. These were refused, and defendant has appealed.

When this case was previously before us (see 308 Pa. 504, 162 A. 281), we held that it was a case for the jury on the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Emery v. Third Nat. Bank of Pbg.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Miller v. Central Trust & Savings Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. Mahaffey v. FergusonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  4. Fisher v. WorrallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1843
  5. Hexter v. BastSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Field v. MansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Toy v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Scaife Co. v. Rockwell-Standard Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Sunquest Information Systems, Inc. v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. John N. Wittekamp v. Gulf & Western, Inc. Gulf & Western Industries, Inc. Gulf & Western Manufacturing Co. And Wickes Manufacturing John N. WittekampCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API