Legal Opinion
Sessa v. Riegle
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 22, 1977No. Civ. A. 73-1357PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT, DISCUSSION, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER
HANNUM, District Judge.
This civil action was instituted by the buyer of a standardbred race horse against the seller, to recover for breach of express warranties, an implied warranty of merchantability and an implied warranty of fitness for particular purpose. Having heard the testimony of witnesses for the plaintiff and for the defendants during a trial before the Court without a jury, and on the basis of the pleadings and exhibits of the parties, the Court enters the following Findings of Fact, Discussion and Conclusions of Law.
FINDIN…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Jakubowski v. Minnesota Mining and ManufacturingSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
- Schneider v. Chrysler Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
- Paul Vlases v. Montgomery Ward & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
- Kirshon, Et Ux. v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Miron v. Yonkers Raceway, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Beverly Cole Anita S. Perkins Jewell P. Lowe v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- Tralon Corp. v. Cedarapids, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1997
- Royal Typewriter Company, a Division of Litton Business Systems, Inc., a Corporation v. Xerographic Supplies Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Keith v. BuchananCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Gall v. Allegheny County Health DepartmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.